HONOURFOODApp and data scaffold

Founder architecture · one evidence core, three surfaces

Scan the pack.
Build the receipt.

HonourFood remains the accountable evidence system. #### is the intentionally unnamed scanner, Respectful Shop is the working commerce service, and HonourFood Professional is the organisational workflow.

Commercial split

Different jobs.
One truth.

#### · Consumer

Seconds at the shelf

Scan, search, understand, save and watch. Evidence powered by HonourFood; no separate score or database.

Open the working concept
Respectful Shop · Demonstration

Across outlets, before checkout

Test how a food list could become evidence-shortlisted packs, dated offer receipts and a user-controlled retailer handoff. Live retailer connectivity is not yet enabled.

Try the working prototype
HonourFood · Professional

Workflow at portfolio scale

Monitor packs and claims, preserve sources and versions, manage replies, export evidence and connect through an API.

Inspect the customer model
Shared evidence core

One canonical record

Product identity, pack images, claims, ingredients, sources, status, corrections and audit events propagate to every surface.

Inspect the method

Commerce bridge

Intent becomes a basket.
The user keeps control.

  1. 01List intentFood category · dietary preference · household quantity
  2. 02Evidence eligibilityExact pack · exact claim · current receipt · market boundary
  3. 03Offer snapshotRetailer SKU · postcode · price · loyalty and fulfilment terms · timestamp
  4. 04Connector handoffAuthorised product link first; contracted basket connector only after rights, coverage and consent terms are documented
  5. 05Retailer verificationUser checks stock, substitutions, slot, fees, total and checkout
Live input

Barcode + five pack captures

Front, back, ingredients, nutrition and lot/date close-up. The current private form validates identity, file type, signature and size, and shows what is missing.

Planned process

Private evidence queue

Duplicate detection, visual-quality checks, market matching and a reviewer workflow must be implemented and tested before a submission can become a named public receipt.

Demonstration output

Bounded claim receipt

Exact claim, applicable rule, sources and boundary. A verdict is forced to Unresolved until a complete capture is linked to an immutable reviewed pack version.

How the data moves

One service. Separate truth layers.

The mobile app and free website read the same reviewed catalogue. The app does not carry the master dataset; it requests current records and securely caches only what it needs.

  1. 1
    Phone captureGTIN · market · front/back · ingredient/nutrition · lot/date
  2. 2
    Private intakeLive: authenticated submitter and file checks · Planned: duplicate and image-quality checks
  3. 3
    Structured storeProduct/claim/source/version metadata in the database; private image bytes in object storage
  4. 4
    Editorial reviewExact-pack match · rule selection · evidence weighting · manufacturer reply
  5. 5
    Public receiptLive: searchable demonstration, sources and dated events · Gated: member reactions and final finding without exact pack

Storage boundary

Text does not live “inside” the app.

Structured database · Migration-ready

GTINs, markets, products, claims, evidence statuses and source metadata. The immutable pack-version schema now blocks changes and deletion; existing receipts remain explicitly unconfirmed until reviewed links are created.

Private object storage

Original front/back/ingredient/nutrition photographs. Public derivatives are created only for approved receipts and must be stripped of unnecessary metadata.

Device cache

Temporary search results and in-progress offline drafts. It is convenient, encrypted where supported and never the authoritative record.

Manipulation resistance

A purchase price cannot be the anti-bot system.

Gated

Authenticated account event

Public reactions are disabled. Authentication, one mutable choice and consent are necessary but insufficient without a complete fake-review control system.

Planned

Rate and anomaly controls

Set privacy-preserving budgets, flag bursts, document investigations and offer appeals before reactions reopen. Device-integrity signals require a privacy impact and legitimate-interest review first.

Policy live · Input gated

Pack proof over popularity

Any later reactions may express whether a receipt convinces members. They can never establish the evidence status or change a scientific or legal conclusion.

Moderation

No public accusation box

Suggestions enter a private queue. Named claims require an exact pack, a bounded proposition, sources and human review.

Governance

Visible corrections

Every substantive edit creates a dated version. Manufacturers receive a free route to correct facts and submit evidence.

Privacy

Collect the minimum

Feedback requests no identity. Email is requested only after a person separately chooses authenticated project updates.

Release ladder

Earn the right to scale.

  1. 01

    Now

    Working web testbed

    Live: searchable evidence receipts, private five-image pack intake, barcode capture, reviewed-first GTIN lookup, FSA alerts and visible source boundaries. Gated: public reactions. Migration-ready: immutable pack-version records; existing receipts remain unconfirmed until linked.

  2. 02

    Next

    Founder mobile pilot

    Installable camera-first experience, offline submission drafts, guided pack photography, GTIN lookup and a reviewer queue for a small invited cohort.

  3. 03

    After validation

    Public UK application

    Category search, change alerts, product comparison, anti-abuse member reactions and app-store billing only after legal, scientific and demand tests pass.

  4. 04

    Later

    Multi-market network

    Locale-specific labels, rules and evidence with market-qualified product identities—never one global verdict copied across jurisdictions.

Commercial hypothesis · not a launch promise

£10 a year.
B2B funds the evidence.

A single rounded £10 annual membership is clearer and more efficient than a £20 access fee followed by a £5 renewal. It should unlock watchlists, history, advanced search and preferences while public evidence and safety information remain free.

The main funding engine should be professional workflow and monitoring for manufacturers, importers, retailers, advisers and enterprise risk teams. They may buy time-saving tools and private pre-launch checks—never a Supported status, ranking or removal of criticism.

Recommended commercial order

Recruit five paid UK design partners, measure reviewer effort and avoided work, then test the £10 member tier once the catalogue has repeat value. A separate £20 founder contribution can remain optional.

Open the full customer and funding model

Working proof

The web services are already phase one.

Use the #### scanner, Respectful Shop Level 1 retailer handoff and case studies to test the complete decision journey before committing to native apps, contracted basket integrations or a final consumer name.

Try the #### conceptTry Respectful ShopOpen evidence lookupChallenge the plan